Category Archives: Covenant and Law

The Transfiguration of Christ–“This is my beloved Son…hear ye him”

And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart, And was transfigured before them: and his face did shine as the sun, and his raiment was white as the light. And, behold, there appeared unto them Moses and Elias talking with him. Then answered Peter, and said unto Jesus, Lord, it is good for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias. While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him. And when the disciples heard it, they fell on their face, and were sore afraid. And Jesus came and touched them, and said, Arise, and be not afraid. And when they had lifted up their eyes, they saw no man, save Jesus only.
Matthew 17:1-8

The account quoted above is usually called the transfiguration of Christ. It is also found in Mark 9:2-8 and Luke 9:28-36. Many wonder why it happened and why it is recorded for us. In a quick survey, we see that Jesus takes Peter, James, and John up a high mountain where they see a vision (Jesus calls it a vision in Matthew 17:9) of a shining Christ. Then they see Moses and Elijah appear and talk with Him. Impetuous Peter then sticks his foot in his mouth and says to Jesus, “Lord, it is good for us to be here: if thou wilt, let us make here three tabernacles; one for thee, and one for Moses, and one for Elias” (Matthew 17:4). Oops. Not good. Why? That’s the point of this article, and, I believe, the point of the transfiguration itself.

Read more… →

New Covenant Theology–When Did the Old Covenant End and the New Covenant Begin?

There has been much confusion concerning the New Covenant. Some might think that when the New Covenant began and when the Old Covenant ended is not important. I will show you that it is. Covenant theologians believe that the New Covenant is merely a new administration of the same covenant that is also called the Old Covenant. Thus, believing it all to be one covenant, they don’t accept that there was an ending of the Old Covenant and a beginning of a truly fresh, New Covenant.

Read more… →

New Covenant Theology–The Superiority of Jesus Christ and His New Testament Revelation

Christians rightly believe that the written Word of God consists of the sixty-six books of the Old and New Testaments. And, in theory, many Christians would also say that Jesus Christ is the most important figure in the Bible. In practice, however, many of those same Christians elevate Moses above Christ by stressing Old Testament law. But Jesus is not only superior to Moses, He is the pinnacle and goal of the entire revelation of the Bible; He is, in fact, what is revealed. The New Testament, being His New Covenant (“covenant” and “testament” are translated from the same Greek word) in His blood (Luke 22:20; 1 Corinthians 11:25) is, thus, the culmination of Biblical revelation and is the superior testament. This is completely supported by the Bible.

Read more… →

Part 2–New Covenant Theology–The New Covenant and the Decalogue

[This article was revised in January 2019: Further information.]

In part 1, we saw that Catholic and Reformed theologians (as well as others) divide the Mosaic Law into three parts—civil, ceremonial, and moral. They then assert that, while what they call the civil and ceremonial laws are not binding on Christians, the moral laws are still binding. But the Bible reveals the Mosaic Law as a unified whole that cannot be divided. It is either all still binding—and we should be offering sacrifices, not wearing mixed fabric clothing, putting fringes on our garments, not letting bastards into our assemblies, etc.—or none of it is.

Read more… →

Part 1–New Covenant Theology–The New Covenant and the Decalogue

[This article was revised in January 2019: Further information.]

I want to set the record straight concerning the New Covenant and the law. Several times, in just the past couple of weeks alone, I have had it made clear to me that many people simply do not grasp the relationship of the New Covenant to the laws of the Old Covenant, specifically the Ten Commandments. Even prominent theologians, who should know the distinctions of each system of theology, get this relationship wrong. Possibly because of this weak understanding, there has now been a move to try to reach a compromise between New Covenant Theology and Reformed Theology.

Read more… →

New Covenant Theology–Must We Obey a New Law?

[This article was revised in January 2019: Further information.]

New Covenant Theology teaches that Jesus Christ fulfilled the law, and that by fulfilling it, He ended it. But some within New Covenant Theology have also taught that Jesus instituted a new law that we must obey. Is there a new law with new commands that Jesus has given us under the New Covenant? If so, must we obey these commands?

Read more… →

Law Is Not For the Righteous

The following is excerpted largely from my response to a reader who took me to task for my saying that the fourth commandment is not for Christians. A bit of it is also from an email to a brother who asked about 1 Timothy 1:8. The difficulty with the first reader goes beyond Sabbath keeping. It is the error of believing that we must keep the law to obtain or maintain justification. It is a leaven that has spread throughout Christianity (Galatians 5:9). These people ignore the Bible's plain words, such as these penned by Paul: "Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace" (Galatians 5:4).

Dear Mr. Sabbathkeeper,

You have written to me asking me whether, since I say that Christians are not obligated to keep the fourth commandment (“Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy”), do I then believe that it is okay to murder, commit adultery, steal, lie, and covet, prohibitions against these also being found in the Ten Commandments.

Read more… →

If the Law Has Been Abolished, What Condemns People Today?

In response to the question posed in the title, I will ask four more questions, and then I will answer all of the questions: In the judgment, what will condemn people who lived after Adam and before Abraham? In the judgment, what will condemn Jews who lived before Moses? In the judgment, what will condemn a person who lived in eastern Asia at the time of Moses? In the judgment, what will condemn a person who lives in a remote part of Mongolia today?

Read more… →

What Are the Least Commandments in Matthew 5:19?

A. Let’s look at the context surrounding what Jesus said about “these least commandments”:

Don’t think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets. I didn’t come to destroy, but to fulfill. For most certainly, I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not even one smallest letter or one tiny pen stroke shall in any way pass away from the law, until all things are accomplished. Whoever, therefore, shall break one of these least commandments, and teach others to do so, shall be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven; but whoever shall do and teach them shall be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, there is no way you will enter into the Kingdom of Heaven.

Matthew 5:17-20

On one side of the statement, Jesus says He has come to fulfill the law. He also gave two “untils.” He said that until heaven and earth pass away, nothing would pass from the law until all things are accomplished. Since He said He had come to fulfill the law, His coming to fulfill the law was one of the “all things” that had to be accomplished. Heaven and earth have not passed away, but on the cross, Jesus said, “It is finished” (John 19:30). He accomplished all that He came to do. Thus, He has fulfilled the law.

On the other side of the statement, Jesus said that our righteousness must exceed that of the Pharisees. He then gave the “but I tell you” new commands (see “If we are no longer under the law, why did Jesus, in the Sermon on the Mount, raise the standard of the law?” for more information).

Not “Break” but “Loosen”

Something too many commentators ignore is that the Greek word many English translations render as “break” in Matthew 5:19 should really be translated as “loosen.” The word is luō. It is the same word translated as “loose” in Matthew 18:18, for loosening the burial sheets of Lazarus in John 11:44, for untying the donkey in Mark 11:2 and elsewhere, and even for releasing Satan from his prison in Revelation 20:7. In Matthew 5:17, the word for “destroy” is kataluō, where it literally means “to loosen down.” Matthew 5:19 is the only place in both the New Testament and in the English translation of the Greek Septuagint Old Testament where luō is translated “break.” Perhaps many translators translated luō here as “break” because they assumed that is what Jesus meant. But “loosen” make perfect sense.

As we see in the other verses where it is used, luō means the opposite of bind or tie. Jesus is not speaking of someone who respects these least commandments but slips and breaks one. He is talking about someone who believes and teaches that it is perfectly okay to violate these least commandments. This person basically thinks that because we are under grace, we should do whatever we want. Paul warns against this: “For you, brothers, were called for freedom. Only don’t use your freedom for gain to the flesh, but through love be servants to one another” (Galatians 5:13). And, Peter writes, “For this is the will of God, that by well-doing you should put to silence the ignorance of foolish men: as free, and not using your freedom for a cloak of wickedness, but as bondservants of God” (1 Peter 2:15-16).

If this person who teaches this libertine doctrine was saved, then, since all who are saved are under grace, this person will be in the kingdom of God. But he or she will be least. So, we should certainly want to know what are these least commandments.

Not the Old Testament Commandments

So, if Jesus came to fulfill the law, why would He warn against loosening the least commandment and teaching others to do so? When Jesus fulfilled the law, He ended it (see, “In what way did Jesus fulfill the law?”). This fact should immediately warn us that Jesus, in speaking of “these least commandments” is not talking about the commandments of the Old Testament law that He was about to fulfill and end.

Another point to consider is that the Old Testament law had its own punishments, but none of them have anything to do with being least in the kingdom. That is, if an Old Testament Jew had taught that it was perfectly okay to violate the commandments, that person would likely have been stoned to death as a false prophet. In fact, what is really striking about what Jesus says here is that those who break the commandments and even teach others to do so are still in the kingdom! They are least, but they are still there. There is no provision for such grace under the Old Covenant.

Jesus Is Referring to What He Is About to Say

Jesus cannot be referring to Old Testament commands. He must be referring to what He says in the verses that follow that He introduces each time with the words, “But I tell you.” Each of these is an example of how much higher God’s true standards of righteousness are than the mere typological shadows that made up the Old Testament commands. It is these “but I tell you” examples of God’s true standards of righteousness that Jesus refers to in Matthew 5:19 as “these least commandments.” Jesus calls them “least” (elachistos—”shortest,” the “very smallest”) because He is giving only a few, small examples of God’s righteous standards.

All of these commandments can be summed up in one word—love. But it is impossible for even born again Christians to always show perfect love. It is impossible for us to never ever hate our brother without a cause, to never ever lust after someone, to never ever want to return evil for evil, to never ever hate our enemies, and so forth. How, then, can we meet these standards?

There Is Only One Way

The only way our righteousness can exceed that of the scribes and Pharisees is to trust in Jesus Christ as our Savior and have His perfect righteousness imputed to us.

So we see from these Scriptures that Jesus fulfilled the law for us, and that God’s standards of righteousness are not just an outward obedience to the Old Testament commands but an inner obedience that is far beyond what we can fulfill ourselves. Jesus was obedient even to the point of death (Philippians 2:8), and His obedience is imputed to us: “For as through the one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, even so through the obedience of the one, many will be made righteous” (Romans 5:19). We can be saved only by the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ and God’s imputing His righteousness to us.

The fact that God considers Jesus’ righteousness as the righteousness of all believers explains why Christians who trust in Jesus Christ as their Savior but who misunderstand Scripture and loosen, and even teach against, some of Jesus’ commandments are still in the kingdom, and will still be saved.

It’s wrong to teach against God’s righteous standards because they are ways to express His perfect love. Love is what should distinguish us as Christians. Thus, loosening God’s standards of righteousness, the standards of His perfect love, is a serious mistake. But, for someone who is in Jesus Christ, there is no condemnation (Romans 8:1). The salvation of those who trust in Jesus Christ as their Savior doesn’t depend upon their obedience but upon Christ’s death for their disobedience and God’s counting Jesus’ obedience as their own.

Paul writes of how even someone who errs in some beliefs and teachings will still be saved if his foundation is Jesus Christ.

For no one can lay any other foundation than that which has been laid, which is Jesus Christ. But if anyone builds on the foundation with gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay, or stubble; each man’s work will be revealed. For the Day will declare it, because it is revealed in fire; and the fire itself will test what sort of work each man’s work is. If any man’s work remains which he built on it, he will receive a reward. If any man’s work is burned, he will suffer loss, but he himself will be saved, but as through fire.

1 Corinthians 3:11-15

If that person proclaims Jesus Christ as Savior but teaches wrong doctrine—such as loosening God’s standards—on top of that foundation, his teaching will be revealed as wrong. He will suffer loss, but he will still be saved.

Preserving a proper understanding of God’s righteous standards is important for at least four reasons. First, it helps us to begin to grasp God’s pure holiness. Second, it causes us to see how impossible it is for us to achieve God’s standards of righteousness by our works. Third, it focuses our eyes in humility on Jesus Christ, who has paid the penalty for our unrighteousness and whose perfect righteousness God now credits to us. Fourth, since God’s righteous standards express His perfect love, loosening those standards is the same as lowering the standards of true love. I’m not saying that we’ll ever in this life perfectly and consistently express true love, but it’s good to not forget the goal while also knowing that God graciously overlooks our failures.

Finding the Balance

When I speak of balance in our salvation, I don’t mean a balance between law and grace. There is no balance between law and grace. Our salvation is one hundred percent by grace. The balance is between freedom and love.

Jesus Christ has certainly given us freedom from the law: “For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus made me free from the law of sin and of death” (Romans 8:2), and, “Stand firm therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and don’t be entangled again with a yoke of bondage” (Galatians 5:1).

But we must be careful not to use our freedom to live selfishly and without regard to others: “For you, brothers, were called for freedom. Only don’t use your freedom for gain to the flesh, but through love be servants to one another” (Galatians 5:13). We must be careful that, when exercising our freedom, we don’t cause someone who doesn’t yet understand that freedom to stumble: “But be careful that by no means does this liberty of yours become a stumbling block to the weak” (1 Corinthians 8:9), and, “Walk in wisdom toward those who are outside, redeeming the time. Let your speech always be with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer each one” (Colossians 4:5-6).

Turning from grace and freedom to the law inevitably leads to moralism, judgmentalism, and condemnation of others. But a freedom that leads to a selfish disregard of others, becoming easily angered, retaliating when abused, turning from those in need (even if they are enemies), and so forth is also unloving. As we saw in Galatians 5:13 quoted above, the balance is to use our freedom to serve others in love, and to, “Walk in love, even as Christ also loved you, and gave himself up for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweet-smelling fragrance” (Ephesians 5:2).

The “Least Commandments” Can Be Summed Up in Love

As we have seen, the “least commandments” Jesus speaks of in Matthew 5:19 cannot be the Old Testament commands. Jesus fulfilled and ended the Old Testament law. By His death on the Cross, Jesus has saved all who trust in Him as their Savior. He’s paid the penalty for the sins of all believers. We have His righteousness imputed to us, and God has put us under the New Covenant.

The commandments Jesus speaks of in Matthew 5:19 are small (“least”) examples of God’s standard of righteousness. They can be summed up in one word—love. Unlike the Old Testament laws, these commands have no condemnation associated with them. “There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who don’t walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit” (Romans 8:1). Even if we misunderstand our liberty and loosen these New Covenant commands that give us examples of how to love, or we ignorantly teach against them, we are still in the kingdom of heaven because God saves us by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone.

So, when Jesus said, “Whoever, therefore, shall break one of these least commandments, and teach others to do so, shall be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven,” He was not talking about the Old Testament law, of which Hebrews says, “A man who disregards Moses’ law dies without compassion on the word of two or three witnesses” (Hebrews 10:28). Since Jesus said that those who break and even teach against these commands will still be in the kingdom of heaven, He must have been speaking of the non-condemning standards of God’s righteousness of the New Covenant, which is a covenant of grace under which there is no condemnation. Our freedom gives us the grace to reflect God’s righteousness through loving others without the fear of punishment for the times we fall short.

Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ.

Galatians 6:2

Print-friendly PDF Version

Copyright © 2014-2024 Peter Ditzel. Permissions Statement. Unless otherwise noted, Bible references are from the World English Bible (WEB).